Re: moderation

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
• Next message: Pat Myrto: "Re: Got this - not sure of authenticity. Better safe etc..."
• Previous message: Dave Goldberg: "Re: Virus's -- This is an Emacs bomb"
• Maybe in reply to: Jennifer Joy: "moderation"

I'd be willing to add an additional box!

Can we try to remain at least slightly more on track.

>
>
>Anybody want to start a new business?  I would almost pay for a filtered
>and moderated version of all security lists.  Of course, information is
>should be free and have full disclosure (NOT IT'S SHOULDN'T) (YES IT SHOULD) 
>(NO) (YES) (NO) (YES)... so that would bad.
>
>ARGHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!
>
>Of course, I am not proposing clari.security.god-like.tidbits or anything, 
>I just cannot believe the egos, the posturing, and same arguments going 
>'round and 'round (Usenet-itis).
>
>So, for many of us, if you want to take the heat of declaring yourself
>censure for security and start a list like RISKS, that would be great.
>I'd definitely send you a box of chocolates and a sincere thanks. :-)
>
>jen
>
>-- 
>       Jennifer Joy  sys/net admin   Motorola/RISC HW  Austin,TX
>jjoy@risc.sps.mot.com 512.891.8561 fax:512.891.3190 pgr:933-7333 #898561
>
>


Dana Nowell                             Work: DanaNowell@corsof.com
Cornerstone Software Inc.               Home: dnowell@mv.mv.com

(Standard disclaimer in force).

• Next message: Pat Myrto: "Re: Got this - not sure of authenticity. Better safe etc..."
• Previous message: Dave Goldberg: "Re: Virus's -- This is an Emacs bomb"
• Maybe in reply to: Jennifer Joy: "moderation"